Comparison
Ciccioli croccanti vs Greppole
Overall, Ciccioli croccanti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ciccioli croccanti | Greppole |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 648 kcal | 575 kcal |
| Fat | 54 g | 49.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 18.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 41 g | 35.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Greppole has 11% fewer calories (575 kcal vs 648 kcal).
- Ciccioli croccanti has no sugar, while Greppole has 3.5 g.
- Ciccioli croccanti has 14% more protein (41 g vs 35.2 g).
Ingredients
Ciccioli croccanti
Not available.
Greppole
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ciccioli croccanti or Greppole?
Overall, Ciccioli croccanti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Greppole has fewer calories: 575 kcal versus 648 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ciccioli croccanti has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.