Comparison

Chorizo tranche vs Chorizo FORT

Overall, Chorizo FORT has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChorizo trancheChorizo FORT
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 422 kcal 371 kcal
Fat 34 g 31 g
Saturated fat 14 g 11 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 3.3 g 3.4 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 28 g 22 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chorizo FORT has 12% fewer calories (371 kcal vs 422 kcal).
  • Chorizo FORT has 21% less saturated fat (11 g vs 14 g).
  • Chorizo tranche has 21% more protein (28 g vs 22 g).
  • Only Chorizo FORT lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Chorizo tranche

Not available.

Chorizo FORT

Viande de porc, sel, piment d'Espagne 1,15%, piment de Cayenne 0,95%, dextrose, ail, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, noix de muscade, conservateurs : nitrate de potassium et nitrite de sodium, origan, ferments. 134g de viande de porc mis en oeuvre pour 100g de produit fini. Viande de porc origine Espagne. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque et œuf.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chorizo tranche or Chorizo FORT?

Overall, Chorizo FORT has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chorizo FORT has fewer calories: 371 kcal versus 422 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chorizo tranche has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons