Chocolats suisses assortis vs Toblerone Assortiment
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolats suisses assortis | Toblerone Assortiment |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 559 kcal | 529 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 51 g | 60 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Toblerone Assortiment has 17% less fat (29 g vs 35 g).
- Toblerone Assortiment has 19% less saturated fat (17 g vs 21 g).
- Chocolats suisses assortis has 15% less sugar (51 g vs 60 g).
- Chocolats suisses assortis has 13% more protein (6.4 g vs 5.6 g).
- Only Chocolats suisses assortis lists: Gluten.
- Only Toblerone Assortiment lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Chocolats suisses assortis
Sucre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, matière grasse végétale (palmiste, coprah, palme), _noisettes_, lactose_, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, _amandes_, émulsifiants (lécithine de _soja_), sirop de glucose, extrait de malt d'_orge_, beurre _laitier_ concentré, arômes vanille.
Toblerone Assortiment
Sucre, lait entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, miel (3%), beurre concentré, amandes (1,6%), émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), blanc d'œuf, arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolats suisses assortis or Toblerone Assortiment?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Toblerone Assortiment has fewer calories: 529 kcal versus 559 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolats suisses assortis has less sugar: 51 g versus 60 g per 100 g.