Chocoladeletter E melk vs Chocoladeletter melk
Overall, Chocoladeletter melk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocoladeletter E melk | Chocoladeletter melk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 560 kcal | 533 kcal |
| Fat | 35.4 g | 30.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.2 g | 18.3 g |
| Sugars | 51.8 g | 55.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocoladeletter melk has 14% less fat (30.5 g vs 35.4 g).
- Chocoladeletter melk has 14% less saturated fat (18.3 g vs 21.2 g).
- Chocoladeletter melk has 23% more fiber (3.1 g vs 2.4 g).
Ingredients
Chocoladeletter E melk
Suiker, cacaoboter, volle _melk_poeder, cacaomassa, weipoeder (_melk_), melkvet, emulgator (_soja_lecithinen)
Chocoladeletter melk
Suiker, cacaoboter, cacaomassa, volle MELKpoeder, emulgator: SOJAlecithine, natuurlijk vanille-aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocoladeletter E melk or Chocoladeletter melk?
Overall, Chocoladeletter melk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocoladeletter melk has fewer calories: 533 kcal versus 560 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocoladeletter E melk has less sugar: 51.8 g versus 55.6 g per 100 g.