Choco Softies vs China Gemüse
Overall, China Gemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choco Softies | China Gemüse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 52.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 5 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- China Gemüse has 93% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 372 kcal).
- China Gemüse has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.9 g).
- China Gemüse has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.2 g).
- China Gemüse has 95% less sugar (2.4 g vs 52.5 g).
- Choco Softies has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Choco Softies has 22% more protein (2.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- China Gemüse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only China Gemüse lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Choco Softies
Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, 28% Schokolade (Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Emulgatoren: Sonnenblumenlecithine, Polyglycerin-Polyricinoleat, natürliches Aroma), Wasser, Waffel (_Weizenmehl_, Palmöl, Emulgator: Sonnenblumenlecithine, Backtriebmittel: Natriumcarbonate, Speisesalz), _Hühnereitrockeneiweiß_, Feuchthaltemittel: Sorbit, Geliermittel: Agar-Agar, Speisesalz, natürliches Aroma
China Gemüse
Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Schokolade 24 % (Zucker, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, magerer Kakao, Vollmilchpulver, Emulgator Lecithine (Soja), Vanilleextrakt), Waffel (Weizenmehl, Zucker, Sahnepulver, Palmfett, Emulgator Lecithine (Soja), natürliches Aroma, Backtriebmittel Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Salz), Feuchthaltemittel Sorbitsirup, Hühnerei - Trockeneiweiß (aus Bodenhaltung), natürliches Aroma. Kann auch Anteile von Haselnuss, Mandel und anderen Nüssen enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choco Softies or China Gemüse?
Overall, China Gemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
China Gemüse has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
China Gemüse has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 52.5 g per 100 g.