Chocapic vs NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien
Overall, NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocapic | NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 375 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 22.4 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 7.7 g | 8.6 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien has 40% less fat (2.9 g vs 4.8 g).
- NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien has 46% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien has 10% more fiber (8.6 g vs 7.7 g).
Ingredients
Chocapic
Farine de blé complet 35,1%, chocolat en poudre 22,5 % (sucre, cacao en poudre), farine de blé 17,0 %, semoule de maïs, sirop de glucose, sucre, extrait de malt d'orge (orge, orge malté), huile de tournesol, carbonate de calcium, émulsifiant : lécithines ; sel, arômes naturels, fer, vitamines B3, B5, D, B6, B1, B2 et B9.
NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien
52,7% VOLLKORNWEIZENMEHL, Zucker, Maisgrieß, Glukosesirup, 5,5% fettarmer Kakao*, Calciumcarbonat, Sonnenblumenöl, Salz, natürliches Aroma, Eisen, Niacin, Pantothensäure, Vitamin D, Vitamin B6, Thiamin (Vit. B1), Riboflavin (Vit. B2), Folsäure. Kann MILCH und NÜSSE enthalten.*Rainforest Alliance-zertifiziert.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocapic or NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien?
Overall, NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien has fewer calories: 375 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
NESTLE NESQUIK Cerealien has less sugar: 22 g versus 22.4 g per 100 g.