Comparison
Chips triple cooked vs Slimming World Chips
Overall, Slimming World Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips triple cooked | Slimming World Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 104 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Slimming World Chips has 44% fewer calories (104 kcal vs 186 kcal).
- Slimming World Chips has 97% less fat (0.3 g vs 11 g).
- Slimming World Chips has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- Chips triple cooked has 18% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Slimming World Chips has 33% more protein (3.3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Slimming World Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips triple cooked
potatoes 89%, vegetable oils(corn, rapeseed, sunflower), beef dripping 3%,, salt
Slimming World Chips
Potato, sea salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips triple cooked or Slimming World Chips?
Overall, Slimming World Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Slimming World Chips has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips triple cooked has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.