Chips saveur poulet rôti vs Multipack automatisé Vico (chèvre, merguez, poulet)
Overall, Chips saveur poulet rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Chips saveur poulet rôti
Multipack automatisé Vico (chèvre, merguez, poulet)
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips saveur poulet rôti | Multipack automatisé Vico (c... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 502 kcal | 516 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has 21% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.8 g).
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has 50% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has 12% more fiber (5.1 g vs 4.5 g).
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips saveur poulet rôti
Pommes de terre (62 /0), huiles végétales (tournesol), colza, maïs en proportion variable), base aromatisante poulet rôti (sucre, chlorure de potassium, sel, oignon en poudre, arômes, sauge, acidifiant (acide citrique), colorant (extrait de paprika)).
Multipack automatisé Vico (chèvre, merguez, poulet)
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips saveur poulet rôti or Multipack automatisé Vico (chèvre, merguez, poulet)?
Overall, Chips saveur poulet rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips saveur poulet rôti has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 516 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips saveur poulet rôti has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.