Comparison

Chips Salt & Vinegar vs Sea Salt & Chardonnay Wine Vinegar Crisps

Overall, Chips Salt & Vinegar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips Salt & VinegarSea Salt & Chardonnay Wine V...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 521 kcal 496 kcal
Fat 30 g 27 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 2.8 g
Sugars 0.7 g 5.2 g
Salt 1.6 g 3 g
Fiber 4.4 g 2.9 g
Protein 6.5 g 6.8 g
Additives23
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sea Salt & Chardonnay Wine Vinegar Crisps has 10% less fat (27 g vs 30 g).
  • Chips Salt & Vinegar has 18% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Chips Salt & Vinegar has 87% less sugar (0.7 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Chips Salt & Vinegar has 47% less salt (1.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Chips Salt & Vinegar has 34% more fiber (4.4 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Chips Salt & Vinegar has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sea Salt & Chardonnay Wine Vinegar Crisps lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Chips Salt & Vinegar

Kartoffeln, pflanzliche Öle (Mais, Sonnenblume, Raps in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), Aroma, Maisstärke, Salz, Säureregulatoren (Citronensäure, Äpfelsäure), Kaliumchlorid, Hefeextrakt.

Sea Salt & Chardonnay Wine Vinegar Crisps

potato, sunflower oil, lactose (milk), sea salt, acidity regulator (sodium diacetate), citric acid, chardonnay wine vinegar, yeast extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips Salt & Vinegar or Sea Salt & Chardonnay Wine Vinegar Crisps?

Overall, Chips Salt & Vinegar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sea Salt & Chardonnay Wine Vinegar Crisps has fewer calories: 496 kcal versus 521 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips Salt & Vinegar has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons