Chips extra craquantes au poulet roti vs Chips saveur poulet rôti
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips extra craquantes au po... | Chips saveur poulet rôti |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 540 kcal | 543 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips saveur poulet rôti has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Chips extra craquantes au poulet roti has 10% more fiber (5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Only Chips saveur poulet rôti lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chips extra craquantes au poulet roti
Pommes de terre (France) 58.9%, huile de tournesol 34%, base aromatisante poulet rôti [arôme, ail déshydraté en poudre, viande de poulet en poudre 1%], sel. Traces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, lait, céleri et moutarde.
Chips saveur poulet rôti
Pomme de terre 58,9% , huile de tournesol 34%, assaisonnement saveur poulet rôti (maltodextrine, extrait de levure, sucre, oignon en poudre, sel, ail en poudre, extrait de malt d'orge (dont gluten), arômes naturels, poudre de poulet, extrait d'épice, graisse de volaille, colorant : extrait de paprika), sel. Traces de céleri, de lait et de moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips extra craquantes au poulet roti or Chips saveur poulet rôti?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips extra craquantes au poulet roti has fewer calories: 540 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips saveur poulet rôti has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.