Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu vs Chips de sarrasin au sel de Guérande
Overall, Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu
Chips de sarrasin au sel de Guérande
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips de sarrasin saveur noi... | Chips de sarrasin au sel de... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 534 kcal | 542 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 34.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | — |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips de sarrasin au sel de Guérande has 94% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu has 38% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.4 g).
- Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu
Farine de blé noir 62%, huile de tournesol, poudre de crème (lait), farine de maïs toastée, poudre de fromage bleu 1,08% (lait), arômes naturels (lait), sel de Guérande, poivre. Traces éventuelles de gluten, oeuf. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice.
Chips de sarrasin au sel de Guérande
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu or Chips de sarrasin au sel de Guérande?
Overall, Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips de sarrasin saveur noix & bleu has fewer calories: 534 kcal versus 542 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips de sarrasin au sel de Guérande has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.