Chips à l’ancienne nature vs Chips à l’Ancienne Nature
Overall, Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips à l’ancienne nature | Chips à l’Ancienne Nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 581 kcal | 535 kcal |
| Fat | 39.5 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 6.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has 16% less fat (33 g vs 39.5 g).
- Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has 25% less saturated fat (3 g vs 4 g).
- Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has 17% more protein (6.5 g vs 5.4 g).
Ingredients
Chips à l’ancienne nature
Not available.
Chips à l’Ancienne Nature
Huile de tournesol 33..% pomme de terre 63% sel 1,1%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips à l’ancienne nature or Chips à l’Ancienne Nature?
Overall, Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has fewer calories: 535 kcal versus 581 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips à l’ancienne nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.