Comparison

Chips à l’ancienne nature vs Chips à l’Ancienne Nature

Overall, Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips à l’ancienne natureChips à l’Ancienne Nature
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 581 kcal 535 kcal
Fat 39.5 g 33 g
Saturated fat 4 g 3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber 4 g 4 g
Protein 5.4 g 6.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has 16% less fat (33 g vs 39.5 g).
  • Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has 25% less saturated fat (3 g vs 4 g).
  • Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has 17% more protein (6.5 g vs 5.4 g).

Ingredients

Chips à l’ancienne nature

Not available.

Chips à l’Ancienne Nature

Huile de tournesol 33..% pomme de terre 63% sel 1,1%

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips à l’ancienne nature or Chips à l’Ancienne Nature?

Overall, Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chips à l’Ancienne Nature has fewer calories: 535 kcal versus 581 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips à l’ancienne nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons