Chili con carne au bœuf vs Chili con carne Bœuf
Overall, Chili con carne Bœuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Chili con carne au bœuf
Chili con carne Bœuf
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chili con carne au bœuf | Chili con carne Bœuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 94 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chili con carne Bœuf has 42% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Only Chili con carne Bœuf lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chili con carne au bœuf
Eau, haricots rouges précuits 34%, viande bovine cuite 10% (origine : France), carottes 4,4%, maïs 3,5%, poivrons 3,5%, concentré de tomate, oignon en poudre, huile de tournesol, sel, épices, ail en poudre, arôme naturel, épaississants : gomme xanthane, gomme guar, colorant : extrait de paprika,
Chili con carne Bœuf
Eau, haricots rouges réhydratés 33 %, concentré de tomates 3%, poivrons 1%, maïs 3 %, oignons 0,5%, sel, farine de blé 0,5%, cumin, arôme naturel de poivre avec autres arômes naturels, coriandre en poudre, colorant : extrait de paprika, ail en poudre, piment fort. Peut contenir des traces de blé, céleri, lait, moutarde, œuf. Viande de bœuf : origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chili con carne au bœuf or Chili con carne Bœuf?
Overall, Chili con carne Bœuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chili con carne au bœuf has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 94 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili con carne Bœuf has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.