Charlotte de picardie vs Pommes de terre à chair ferme
Overall, Pommes de terre à chair ferme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Charlotte de picardie | Pommes de terre à chair ferm... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 89 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terre à chair ferme has 15% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 89 kcal).
- Pommes de terre à chair ferme has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Charlotte de picardie
Pommes de terre de consommation à chair ferme. Variété: Charlotte
Pommes de terre à chair ferme
Pommes de terre à chair ferme,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Charlotte de picardie or Pommes de terre à chair ferme?
Overall, Pommes de terre à chair ferme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terre à chair ferme has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Charlotte de picardie has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.