Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl vs Steinpilze
Overall, Steinpilze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl | Steinpilze |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | — |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 35 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl has 94% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 301 kcal).
- Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl has 87% less fat (0.4 g vs 3 g).
- Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Steinpilze has no salt, while Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl has 0.7 g.
- Steinpilze has 94% more protein (35 g vs 2.2 g).
- Steinpilze has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl
Champignons, Wasser, Salz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure.
Steinpilze
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl or Steinpilze?
Overall, Steinpilze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champions Scheiben 2.Wahl has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.