Comparison
Chablis vs Petit Chablis 2010
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Chablis
Union des viticulteurs de Chablis · 75cl
Petit Chablis 2010
Jean-Pierre Alexandre Ellevin · 75 cl
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chablis | Petit Chablis 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chablis has no calories, while Petit Chablis 2010 has 73 kcal.
- Chablis has no sugar, while Petit Chablis 2010 has 15.5 g.
- Petit Chablis 2010 has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Petit Chablis 2010 has 100% more protein (0.8 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Chablis
wine.
Petit Chablis 2010
Raisins blancs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chablis or Petit Chablis 2010?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chablis has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chablis has less sugar: 0 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.