Cedevita naranča vs Sabor Tropical
Overall, Sabor Tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cedevita naranča | Sabor Tropical |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 6 | 10 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sabor Tropical has 58% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 26 kcal).
- Sabor Tropical has 63% less sugar (2.4 g vs 6.4 g).
Ingredients
Cedevita naranča
Šećer, kiselina limunska kiselina, regulator kiselosti: natrijev hidrogenkarbonat, prirodna aroma naranče, bojilo: E160e, L-askorbinska kiselina, DL-alfa-tokoferil acetat, nikotinamid, zgušnjivač: E414, kalcijev D-pantotenat, tiamin-mononitrat, natrijev riboflavin-5'-fosfat, piridoksin-hidroklorid, cijanokobalamin, pteroilmonoglutaminska kiselina,
Sabor Tropical
Açúcar, acidificantes (E-296, ácido cítrico), edulcorantes (aspartame, acessulfame K), regulador de acidez (E-331), aromas, vitamina C, corantes (E-120, E-100), sumo de laranja desidratado (0,3%), sumo de morango desidratado (0,2%), maltodextrina, espessante (E-466), polme de manga desidratado (0,1%), beta-caroteno, acetato de vitamina A, ácido fólico, vitamina B2. Contém uma fonte de fenilalanina.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cedevita naranča or Sabor Tropical?
Overall, Sabor Tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sabor Tropical has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sabor Tropical has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.