Comparison
Cedevita vs Acqua minerale
Overall, Acqua minerale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cedevita | Acqua minerale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 366 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 84 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acqua minerale has no calories, while Cedevita has 366 kcal.
- Acqua minerale has no sugar, while Cedevita has 84 g.
- Acqua minerale has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.3 g).
- Acqua minerale has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cedevita
Not available.
Acqua minerale
Acqua
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cedevita or Acqua minerale?
Overall, Acqua minerale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acqua minerale has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acqua minerale has less sugar: 0 g versus 84 g per 100 g.