Comparison
Caviar Royal vs Caviar baerii
Overall, Caviar baerii has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caviar Royal | Caviar baerii |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 316 kcal | 259 kcal |
| Fat | 20.8 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 28.4 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Esturgeon | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caviar baerii has 18% fewer calories (259 kcal vs 316 kcal).
- Caviar baerii has 18% less fat (17 g vs 20.8 g).
- Caviar baerii has 38% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5.5 g).
- Caviar Royal has no sugar, while Caviar baerii has 0.7 g.
- Caviar Royal has 12% more protein (28.4 g vs 25 g).
- Only Caviar Royal lists: Esturgeon.
Ingredients
Caviar Royal
Oeufs d'_esturgeon_ 96,5%, sel, conservateur E285
Caviar baerii
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caviar Royal or Caviar baerii?
Overall, Caviar baerii has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caviar baerii has fewer calories: 259 kcal versus 316 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caviar Royal has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.