Comparison
Caviar vs Caviar Royal
Overall, Caviar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caviar | Caviar Royal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 316 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 20.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 53.3 g | 28.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Esturgeon |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caviar has 52% less fat (10 g vs 20.8 g).
- Caviar has no saturated fat, while Caviar Royal has 5.5 g.
- Caviar has 14% less salt (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Caviar has 47% more protein (53.3 g vs 28.4 g).
- Caviar has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Caviar Royal lists: Fish, Esturgeon.
Ingredients
Caviar
Not available.
Caviar Royal
Œufs d'_esturgeon_ 96,5 %, sel, conservateur E285.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caviar or Caviar Royal?
Overall, Caviar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caviar has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 316 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caviar has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.