Comparison
Cassonade vs Sucre roux pur canne cassonade
Overall, Sucre roux pur canne cassonade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassonade | Sucre roux pur canne cassona... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 99 g | 95 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassonade has no fat, while Sucre roux pur canne cassonade has 0.5 g.
- Sucre roux pur canne cassonade has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Sucre roux pur canne cassonade has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Cassonade
Sucre roux de canne
Sucre roux pur canne cassonade
100% sucre roux de canne.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassonade or Sucre roux pur canne cassonade?
Overall, Sucre roux pur canne cassonade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre roux pur canne cassonade has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre roux pur canne cassonade has less sugar: 95 g versus 99 g per 100 g.