Comparison

Carrefour Selection Mortadella Bologna vs SIMPL Filet de poulet

Overall, SIMPL Filet de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCarrefour Selection Mortadel...SIMPL Filet de poulet
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 262 kcal 132 kcal
Fat 22 g 5.6 g
Saturated fat 7.9 g 1.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.5 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.5 g
Protein 16 g 17 g
Additives28
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • SIMPL Filet de poulet has 50% fewer calories (132 kcal vs 262 kcal).
  • SIMPL Filet de poulet has 75% less fat (5.6 g vs 22 g).
  • SIMPL Filet de poulet has 78% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 7.9 g).
  • SIMPL Filet de poulet has 24% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
  • SIMPL Filet de poulet has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only SIMPL Filet de poulet lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Carrefour Selection Mortadella Bologna

Viande de porc, sel, arômes naturels, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, macis, ail, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque.

SIMPL Filet de poulet

Viande de poulet 86%, eau, amidon de pomme de terre, sel, sirop de glucose, dextrose, arôme, arôme de fumée, extraits d'épices, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, stabilisants: diphosphate disodique - triphosphate pentasodique - polyphosphate sodique, conservateur: nitrite de sodium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Carrefour Selection Mortadella Bologna or SIMPL Filet de poulet?

Overall, SIMPL Filet de poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

SIMPL Filet de poulet has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carrefour Selection Mortadella Bologna has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons