Comparison

Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout vs Carrefour Classic' Noix de Muscade Entière

Overall, Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCarrefour Classic' Ras el Ha...Carrefour Classic' Noix de M...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 245 kcal 506 kcal
Fat 10 g 36 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 26 g
Sugars 3.8 g 29 g
Salt 28 g 0.1 g
Fiber 23 g 21 g
Protein 11 g 5.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has 52% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 506 kcal).
  • Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has 72% less fat (10 g vs 36 g).
  • Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has 95% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 26 g).
  • Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has 87% less sugar (3.8 g vs 29 g).
  • Carrefour Classic' Noix de Muscade Entière has 100% less salt (0.1 g vs 28 g).
  • Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has 47% more protein (11 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Carrefour Classic' Noix de Muscade Entière is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout

Poudre de paprika 31%, sel, cumin, coriandre, poivre noir 6%, fenouil, chillies, fenugrec 4%, gingembre. Peut contenir des traces de céleri, moutarde et blé.

Carrefour Classic' Noix de Muscade Entière

Noix de muscade.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout or Carrefour Classic' Noix de Muscade Entière?

Overall, Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 506 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carrefour Classic' Ras el Hanout has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 29 g per 100 g.

More comparisons