Car en Sac vs Raffaello
Overall, Car en Sac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Car en Sac | Raffaello |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 627 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 48.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 29.5 g |
| Sugars | 73 g | 33.6 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Car en Sac has 44% fewer calories (354 kcal vs 627 kcal).
- Car en Sac has 99% less fat (0.5 g vs 48.3 g).
- Car en Sac has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 29.5 g).
- Raffaello has 54% less sugar (33.6 g vs 73 g).
- Raffaello has 77% more protein (7.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Only Raffaello lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Car en Sac
Sucre; sirop de sucre mélassé; farine de blé; amidon, extrait de réglisse; maltodextrine; arôme; émulsifiant mono - diglycerides d'acides gras; sel; concentrés de fruits et de planta spiruline, carthame, radis, citron, cassis, carotte; correcteur d'acidité carbonate acide de sodium; agents d'enrobage: cire d'abeille blanches. jaune, cire de carnauba.
Raffaello
grated coconut 25.5%, vegetable fats (palm, shea), sugar, almond 8%, skimmed milk powder, whey powder, wheat flour, starch, emulsifiers: lecithins [soy], flavourings, baking powder: sodium acid carbonate, salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Car en Sac or Raffaello?
Overall, Car en Sac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Car en Sac has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 627 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Raffaello has less sugar: 33.6 g versus 73 g per 100 g.