Caprice des Dieux vs Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG)
Overall, Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Caprice des Dieux
Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG)
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caprice des Dieux | Fromage de chèvre Sainte Mau... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 277 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has 17% fewer calories (277 kcal vs 333 kcal).
- Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has 27% less fat (22 g vs 30 g).
- Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has 29% less saturated fat (15 g vs 21 g).
- Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has no sugar, while Caprice des Dieux has 0.5 g.
- Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Caprice des Dieux
Französischer Rahm-Weichkäse aus pasteurisierter Milch, Doppelrahmstufe
Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG)
Lait de chèvre pasteurisé (Origine UE) - sel - ferments lactiques et d'affinage (contient lait) - présure animale ou coagulent microbien.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caprice des Dieux or Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG)?
Overall, Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fromage de chèvre Sainte Maure (26% MG) has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.