Comparison

Cappellacci vs Pilzragout mit Nudeln

Overall, Cappellacci has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCappellacciPilzragout mit Nudeln
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 245 kcal 155 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 7.8 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 4.1 g
Sugars 8.2 g 0.1 g
Salt 1.6 g 0.8 g
Fiber 6.4 g 0.2 g
Protein 6.4 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pilzragout mit Nudeln has 37% fewer calories (155 kcal vs 245 kcal).
  • Cappellacci has 12% less fat (6.9 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Cappellacci has 61% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Pilzragout mit Nudeln has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Pilzragout mit Nudeln has 50% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Cappellacci has 98% more fiber (6.4 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Cappellacci has 45% more protein (6.4 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Only Pilzragout mit Nudeln lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Cappellacci

Not available.

Pilzragout mit Nudeln

Bandnudeln gegart 45 % (Trinkwasser, Hartweizengrieẞ, Eier, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Sonnenblumenöl), Pilze in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen 27 % (Champignons, Austernseitlinge, Shiitake, japanische Stockschwämmchen, Steinpilze), Sahne 21 %, Trinkwasser, Tomaten, Maisstärke, Butter, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Gewürze. Eier aus Bodenhaltung. Kann Spuren von Sellerie, Soja und Senf enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cappellacci or Pilzragout mit Nudeln?

Overall, Cappellacci has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pilzragout mit Nudeln has fewer calories: 155 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pilzragout mit Nudeln has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 8.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons