Comparison

Cappellacci vs Pasta con setas

Overall, Pasta con setas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCappellacciPasta con setas
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 245 kcal 362 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 2.6 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 0.5 g
Sugars 8.2 g 5.1 g
Salt 1.6 g 0.4 g
Fiber 6.4 g 4.3 g
Protein 6.4 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cappellacci has 32% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 362 kcal).
  • Pasta con setas has 62% less fat (2.6 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Pasta con setas has 69% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Pasta con setas has 38% less sugar (5.1 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Pasta con setas has 77% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Cappellacci has 33% more fiber (6.4 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Pasta con setas has 66% more protein (19 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Pasta con setas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pasta con setas lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Cappellacci

Not available.

Pasta con setas

Pasta 75% (sémola de _trigo_), proteína de guisante texturizada 9%, cebolla, setas, 3.5% (champiñon y boletus edulis silvestre y de su grupo), calabaza, albahaca, ajo, pimienta negra

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cappellacci or Pasta con setas?

Overall, Pasta con setas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cappellacci has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pasta con setas has less sugar: 5.1 g versus 8.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons