Comparison
Canola oil cooking spray vs Rypsiöljy
Overall, Rypsiöljy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Canola oil cooking spray | Rypsiöljy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 891 kcal | 900 kcal |
| Fat | 99 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 29 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rypsiöljy has 76% less saturated fat (7 g vs 29 g).
- Rypsiöljy has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rypsiöljy is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Canola oil cooking spray lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Canola oil cooking spray
Canola Oil, Soy Lecithin. CONTAINS: Soy.
Rypsiöljy
Rypsiöljyä
FAQ
Which is healthier: Canola oil cooking spray or Rypsiöljy?
Overall, Rypsiöljy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Canola oil cooking spray has fewer calories: 891 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Canola oil cooking spray has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.