Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g vs Cancoillotte Nature
Overall, Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g
Cancoillotte Nature
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g | Cancoillotte Nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 155 kcal |
| Fat | 9.4 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has 15% less fat (9.4 g vs 11 g).
- Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has 11% less saturated fat (6.4 g vs 7.2 g).
- Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has no sugar, while Cancoillotte Nature has 0.5 g.
- Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has 25% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Cancoillotte Nature is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g
Eau ; ; metton**(lait écrémé thermisé (Origine France)- température inférieure à la pasteurisation, ferments lactiques**) ; ; beurre** ; ; ail 1.5% ; ; sels de fonte : disphosphates, triphosphates et polyphosphates de sodium ; ; sel. **dont lait
Cancoillotte Nature
Eau, metton (lait écrémé caillé), beurre, sels de fonte: citrates de sodium, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g or Cancoillotte Nature?
Overall, Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cancoillotte a l'ail 250g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.