Canapés seigle vs Toast Rond Froment 280g (36 tranches)
Overall, Canapés seigle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Canapés seigle | Toast Rond Froment 280g (36... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 296 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 5.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Canapés seigle has 11% fewer calories (264 kcal vs 296 kcal).
- Canapés seigle has 31% less fat (4.1 g vs 5.9 g).
- Canapés seigle has 52% less sugar (4.3 g vs 9 g).
- Canapés seigle has 16% more protein (8.8 g vs 7.4 g).
- Only Toast Rond Froment 280g (36 tranches) lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Canapés seigle
Not available.
Toast Rond Froment 280g (36 tranches)
Farine de blé 66%, eau, huile de colza, sucre, arôme naturel (contient alcool), sel, levure, gluten de blé, émulsifiants : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, esters mono - et diacétyltartriques des mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, conservateur : propionate de calcium, farine de fève, agent de traitement de la farine : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Canapés seigle or Toast Rond Froment 280g (36 tranches)?
Overall, Canapés seigle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Canapés seigle has fewer calories: 264 kcal versus 296 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Canapés seigle has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 9 g per 100 g.