Comparison

Caille filets et cuisses vs 3 cailles

Overall, 3 cailles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Caille filets et cuisses	3 cailles
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	—	1
Calories	175 kcal	0 kcal
Fat	10 g	0 g
Saturated fat	2.9 g	0 g
Sugars	1 g	0 g
Salt	0.2 g	0 g
Fiber	1 g	0 g
Protein	21 g	0 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

3 cailles has no calories, while Caille filets et cuisses has 175 kcal.
3 cailles has no fat, while Caille filets et cuisses has 10 g.
3 cailles has no saturated fat, while Caille filets et cuisses has 2.9 g.
3 cailles has no sugar, while Caille filets et cuisses has 1 g.
Caille filets et cuisses has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
Caille filets et cuisses has 100% more protein (21 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Caille filets et cuisses

Not available.

3 cailles

Cailles

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caille filets et cuisses or 3 cailles?

Overall, 3 cailles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

3 cailles has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

3 cailles has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

3 cailles vs Codorniz asada Caille filets et cuisses vs Codorniz asada 2 cailles vs 3 cailles Caille filets et cuisses vs 2 cailles 4 cailles farcies aux fi... vs 3 cailles Caille filets et cuisses vs 4 cailles farcies aux fi... 4 cailles farcies aux po... vs 3 cailles Caille filets et cuisses vs 4 cailles farcies aux po...