Cacolac Nature Boîte 25 Cl vs Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L
Overall, Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Cacolac Nature Boîte 25 Cl
Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Cacolac Nature Boîte 25 Cl | Mon Premier Cacolac Format F... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 61 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cacolac Nature Boîte 25 Cl has 44% less fat (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Cacolac Nature Boîte 25 Cl has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L has 36% less sugar (7 g vs 11 g).
- Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
- Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cacolac Nature Boîte 25 Cl
Lait à 8 g MG/L (92,1%), Sucre, Cacao (1,2%), stabilisants : carbonate acide de sodium, carraghénanes.
Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L
Lait demi écrémé à teneur réduite en lactose (96%), chocolat en poudre (3,8%),(sucre, cacao en poudre), sucre, arômes naturels, stabilisants: gomme gellane.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cacolac Nature Boîte 25 Cl or Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L?
Overall, Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L has fewer calories: 61 kcal versus 65 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mon Premier Cacolac Format Familial 1L has less sugar: 7 g versus 11 g per 100 g.