Comparison

Buche glacee vs Caprice des iles

Overall, Buche glacee has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBuche glaceeCaprice des iles
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 181 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 5.2 g 6.1 g
Saturated fat 3.4 g 4.1 g
Sugars 26 g 20 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.3 g 0.5 g
Protein 2.5 g 1.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caprice des iles has 10% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 181 kcal).
  • Buche glacee has 15% less fat (5.2 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Buche glacee has 17% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Caprice des iles has 23% less sugar (20 g vs 26 g).
  • Buche glacee has 78% more fiber (2.3 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Buche glacee has 24% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.9 g).

Ingredients

Buche glacee

FR Dessert glacé composé d'un sorbet à la poire 51,9%, d'une crème glacée au chocolat 36,5%, de biscuits cuillers 11,4%, copeaux de chocolat noir 0,29%, surgelé.

Caprice des iles

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buche glacee or Caprice des iles?

Overall, Buche glacee has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caprice des iles has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caprice des iles has less sugar: 20 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons