Buche glacee vs Caprice des iles
Overall, Buche glacee has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Buche glacee | Caprice des iles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 6.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 4.1 g |
| Sugars | 26 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caprice des iles has 10% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 181 kcal).
- Buche glacee has 15% less fat (5.2 g vs 6.1 g).
- Buche glacee has 17% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 4.1 g).
- Caprice des iles has 23% less sugar (20 g vs 26 g).
- Buche glacee has 78% more fiber (2.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Buche glacee has 24% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Buche glacee
FR Dessert glacé composé d'un sorbet à la poire 51,9%, d'une crème glacée au chocolat 36,5%, de biscuits cuillers 11,4%, copeaux de chocolat noir 0,29%, surgelé.
Caprice des iles
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Buche glacee or Caprice des iles?
Overall, Buche glacee has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caprice des iles has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caprice des iles has less sugar: 20 g versus 26 g per 100 g.