Bucatini vs N-Bucatini n°9
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bucatini | N-Bucatini n°9 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bucatini has 20% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- N-Bucatini n°9 has 69% less sugar (1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Bucatini has 14% more fiber (3.5 g vs 3 g).
- Only N-Bucatini n°9 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bucatini
Not available.
N-Bucatini n°9
Semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure, eau. Peut contenir des traces d'œufs. High quality durum wheat semolina, water. May contain traces of egg. Grieß aus hochwertigem Hartweizen, Wasser. Kann Spuren von Eiern enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bucatini or N-Bucatini n°9?
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bucatini has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
N-Bucatini n°9 has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.