Comparison

Bouchées de fromage au goût de chèvre, pavot, mix provençal, ciboulette, thym vs Cancoillotte

Overall, Cancoillotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBouchées de fromage au goût...Cancoillotte
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 325 kcal 169 kcal
Fat 30 g 12 g
Saturated fat 19 g 7.8 g
Sugars 1.6 g 1 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 9 g 15 g
Additives02
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cancoillotte has 48% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 325 kcal).
  • Cancoillotte has 60% less fat (12 g vs 30 g).
  • Cancoillotte has 59% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 19 g).
  • Cancoillotte has 38% less sugar (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Cancoillotte has 31% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Cancoillotte has 40% more protein (15 g vs 9 g).
  • Cancoillotte has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bouchées de fromage au goût de chèvre, pavot, mix provençal, ciboulette, thym

INGRÉDIENTS DU FROMAGE : Lait de vache et crème de lait de vache (origine : France), lait de chèvre et crème de lait de chèvre 10% (origine : France et Espagne), sel, arôme naturel de fromage de chèvre, ferments lactiques. INGRÉDIENTS SUR LE FROMAGE (en quantité variable) : Thym, pavot, basilic, poivron, ciboulette.

Cancoillotte

_Lait_ écrémé caillé, eau, beurre 14%, sel, sels de fonte (di, tri, polyphosphate de sodium).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bouchées de fromage au goût de chèvre, pavot, mix provençal, ciboulette, thym or Cancoillotte?

Overall, Cancoillotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cancoillotte has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cancoillotte has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons