Comparison

Botersprits vs Delacre sprits chocolat noir

Overall, Botersprits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBoterspritsDelacre sprits chocolat noir
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 548 kcal 537 kcal
Fat 31 g 30.5 g
Saturated fat 21 g 15.9 g
Sugars 24 g 27 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0.9 g —
Protein 4.9 g 4.7 g
Additives06
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Delacre sprits chocolat noir has 24% less saturated fat (15.9 g vs 21 g).
  • Botersprits has 11% less sugar (24 g vs 27 g).
  • Botersprits has 70% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Botersprits is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Botersprits lists: Eggs.
  • Only Delacre sprits chocolat noir lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Botersprits

wheat flour, 26,5% butter (milk) concentrate (32% reconstituted butter), sugar, whole egg, salt,

Delacre sprits chocolat noir

Farine de ble (44%) - graisse végétale (palme, colza) - sucre - chocolat (15% (pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, beurre pâtissier, lactose, émulsifiant : lecithine de soja) - beurre pâtissier - écorce de citron sucrée (sucre, citron, acide citrique, amidon de pomme de terre modifié, sel) - lactose et protéines de lait - sel (0.4%) - poudres à lever : carbonates de sodium, diphosphate disodique. peut contenir des traces de fruits a coque, sesame et oeufs

FAQ

Which is healthier: Botersprits or Delacre sprits chocolat noir?

Overall, Botersprits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Delacre sprits chocolat noir has fewer calories: 537 kcal versus 548 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Botersprits has less sugar: 24 g versus 27 g per 100 g.

More comparisons