Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin vs Bonbons au miel de la champagne
Overall, Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin
Bonbons au miel de la champagne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin | Bonbons au miel de la champa... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 378 kcal | 392 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 60 g | 70 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Peanuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin has 14% less sugar (60 g vs 70 g).
- Only Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin lists: Milk, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin
socce de canne . bonbons miel sève de CQit à u-chaUdt00 Le consèd de Corentin : lasè.e&pin reconrxepa-rses vertus antiseptiques sur les voies respiratoires et ure bonne excuse potar céder à la tentation ! Bonbons miel arôme sève de pin : Sucre de canne* 61%, sirop de glucose*, miel* 3,3%, huile essentielle de pin* Ingrédients issus de {'agriculture biologique. Fabriaué dans un atelieçqui utilise fruits à coques, arachides, lait. kca ) 00.1 g-TGl.ucides : 93 g : 0553 20 5249
Bonbons au miel de la champagne
Sucre 46 %, sirop de glucose, miel 15%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin or Bonbons au miel de la champagne?
Overall, Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin has fewer calories: 378 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bonbon Dur Miel Seve De Pin has less sugar: 60 g versus 70 g per 100 g.