Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L vs Bio Rice Drink Almond
Overall, Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L
Bio Rice Drink Almond
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Boisson végétale au riz BIO... | Bio Rice Drink Almond |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has 24% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 70 kcal).
- Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has 68% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.9 g).
- Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has 22% less sugar (3.9 g vs 5 g).
- Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has 64% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.2 g).
- Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Rice Drink Almond is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bio Rice Drink Almond lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L
Eau, riz* 10%, huile de tournesol*, arôme naturel de caramel, sel marin.* Ingrédients issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.
Bio Rice Drink Almond
Eau de source, riz italien (17%), huile de tournesol, pâte d'amande italienne (1%), huile de carthame, sel marin,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L or Bio Rice Drink Almond?
Overall, Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boisson végétale au riz BIO 1L has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 5 g per 100 g.