Blutorangensaft vs 100% succo di arancia rossa
Overall, Blutorangensaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Blutorangensaft | 100% succo di arancia rossa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9 g | 10.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blutorangensaft has 11% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- 100% succo di arancia rossa has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Blutorangensaft has 12% less sugar (9 g vs 10.2 g).
Ingredients
Blutorangensaft
100 % Blutorangensaft mit Fruchtfleisch.
100% succo di arancia rossa
puro succo di arance rosse
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blutorangensaft or 100% succo di arancia rossa?
Overall, Blutorangensaft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blutorangensaft has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blutorangensaft has less sugar: 9 g versus 10.2 g per 100 g.