Blonde non filtré Champ Libre vs Biere abbaye St Erwann 7°
Overall, Blonde non filtré Champ Libre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Blonde non filtré Champ Libre
Biere abbaye St Erwann 7°
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Blonde non filtré Champ Libr... | Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Avoine, Millet |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° has 12% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 52 kcal).
- Blonde non filtré Champ Libre has no fat, while Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° has 2.2 g.
- Blonde non filtré Champ Libre has no saturated fat, while Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° has 0.5 g.
- Blonde non filtré Champ Libre has no sugar, while Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° has 0.6 g.
- Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Only Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° lists: Avoine, Millet.
Ingredients
Blonde non filtré Champ Libre
Eau, malt d'_orge_, malt de _seigle_, houblons, levure. Contient naturellement des sulfites.
Biere abbaye St Erwann 7°
Eau, malt d'_orge_, malt de _froment_, _millet_, _avoine_, sarrasin, _épeautre_, _seigle_, houblon, épices, levures.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blonde non filtré Champ Libre or Biere abbaye St Erwann 7°?
Overall, Blonde non filtré Champ Libre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Biere abbaye St Erwann 7° has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blonde non filtré Champ Libre has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.