Comparison

Bio-Obstriegel - Banane-Maracuja vs Biopure Bite Raw

Overall, Biopure Bite Raw has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio-Obstriegel - Banane-Mara...Biopure Bite Raw
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 337 kcal 468 kcal
Fat 5 g 23.1 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 48 g 39.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 5.2 g 6.8 g
Protein 4.3 g 10.2 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, NutsNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Obstriegel - Banane-Maracuja has 28% fewer calories (337 kcal vs 468 kcal).
  • Bio-Obstriegel - Banane-Maracuja has 78% less fat (5 g vs 23.1 g).
  • Biopure Bite Raw has 88% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Biopure Bite Raw has 18% less sugar (39.4 g vs 48 g).
  • Biopure Bite Raw has 24% more fiber (6.8 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Biopure Bite Raw has 58% more protein (10.2 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Biopure Bite Raw is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Bio-Obstriegel - Banane-Maracuja lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Bio-Obstriegel - Banane-Maracuja

Apfelsaftkonzentrat (28 %), getrocknete Apfelstücke (20 %), Hafervollkornflocken, Rosinen (10 %), Bananenflocken (8 %), Honig, zerkleinerte Mandeln, Maracujasaftkonzentrat (3 %), Maisstärke, Kartoffelstärke. Kann Spuren von Milch, Erdnüssen, Soja, anderen Schalenfrüchten und Sesamsamen enthalten.

Biopure Bite Raw

Cashewkerne, getrocknete Datteln, Rosinen

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio-Obstriegel - Banane-Maracuja or Biopure Bite Raw?

Overall, Biopure Bite Raw has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio-Obstriegel - Banane-Maracuja has fewer calories: 337 kcal versus 468 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Biopure Bite Raw has less sugar: 39.4 g versus 48 g per 100 g.

More comparisons