Bio nature jus de pruneau vs Švestkový nápoj
Overall, Bio nature jus de pruneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Bio nature jus de pruneau | Švestkový nápoj |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio nature jus de pruneau has no fat, while Švestkový nápoj has 0.5 g.
- Bio nature jus de pruneau has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio nature jus de pruneau is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bio nature jus de pruneau
100 % jus de pruneau réhydraté.
Švestkový nápoj
Pitná voda, švestková šťáva vyrobená z koncentrátu švestkové šťávy (15%), švestková dřeň (10%), cukr, koncentrát šťávy z černé mrkve, kyselina: kyselina citronová, vitamin C, aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio nature jus de pruneau or Švestkový nápoj?
Overall, Bio nature jus de pruneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Švestkový nápoj has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Švestkový nápoj has less sugar: 12 g versus 13 g per 100 g.