Bio Käsekrainer vs Käsekrainer
Overall, Bio Käsekrainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Käsekrainer | Käsekrainer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 306 kcal | 337 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 4.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Käsekrainer has 11% less fat (25 g vs 28 g).
- Bio Käsekrainer has 60% less salt (1.9 g vs 4.8 g).
- Only Bio Käsekrainer lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Bio Käsekrainer
70% Schweinefleisch*, 20% BERGKÄSE*, Speck*, Trinkwasser, Gewürze*, Zucker*, Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Schafsaitling, Rauch. *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft
Käsekrainer
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Käsekrainer or Käsekrainer?
Overall, Bio Käsekrainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Käsekrainer has fewer calories: 306 kcal versus 337 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Käsekrainer has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.