Comparison

BIO Cumin Moulu vs Cumin moulu

Overall, Cumin moulu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBIO Cumin MouluCumin moulu
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 427 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 22 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0 g
Sugars 2.3 g 0 g
Salt 0.4 g 0 g
Fiber 11 g —
Protein 18 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cumin moulu has no calories, while BIO Cumin Moulu has 427 kcal.
  • Cumin moulu has no fat, while BIO Cumin Moulu has 22 g.
  • Cumin moulu has no saturated fat, while BIO Cumin Moulu has 1.5 g.
  • Cumin moulu has no sugar, while BIO Cumin Moulu has 2.3 g.
  • Cumin moulu has no salt, while BIO Cumin Moulu has 0.4 g.
  • BIO Cumin Moulu has 100% more protein (18 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

BIO Cumin Moulu

Not available.

Cumin moulu

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: BIO Cumin Moulu or Cumin moulu?

Overall, Cumin moulu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cumin moulu has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 427 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cumin moulu has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons