Bigard tripe a la mode de caen vs Tripes à la mode de Caen
Overall, Bigard tripe a la mode de caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bigard tripe a la mode de ca... | Tripes à la mode de Caen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bigard tripe a la mode de caen has 24% less fat (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Bigard tripe a la mode de caen has 15% more protein (16.5 g vs 14 g).
- Bigard tripe a la mode de caen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bigard tripe a la mode de caen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bigard tripe a la mode de caen
Tripes de bœuf 54% (panses, bonnets, feuillets, caillettes en proportions naturelles), eau, pieds de bœuf désossés oignons, carottes, calvados 1%, sel, ail, épices et aromates.
Tripes à la mode de Caen
Tripes de bovins 53 % (panses, bonnets, feuillets, caillettes de bovins en proportions naturelles), eau, pieds de bovins désossés 6 %, oignons 6%, carottes 6%, calvados 1 %, sel, épices, plantes aromatiques, arôme naturel, colorant : caramel ordinaire
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bigard tripe a la mode de caen or Tripes à la mode de Caen?
Overall, Bigard tripe a la mode de caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes à la mode de Caen has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 84 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bigard tripe a la mode de caen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.