Comparison
Bethmale vs Bethmale de Bamalou
Overall, Bethmale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bethmale | Bethmale de Bamalou |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 371 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bethmale has no sugar, while Bethmale de Bamalou has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Bethmale
Not available.
Bethmale de Bamalou
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bethmale or Bethmale de Bamalou?
Overall, Bethmale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bethmale has fewer calories: 371 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bethmale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.