Belgas Cobertura vs KitKat 50
Overall, Belgas Cobertura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Belgas Cobertura | KitKat 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 456 kcal | 438 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 24.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 24.5 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 35.1 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | — |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 12 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Belgas Cobertura has 15% less fat (21 g vs 24.8 g).
- Belgas Cobertura has 43% less saturated fat (14 g vs 24.5 g).
- Only Belgas Cobertura lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Belgas Cobertura
Farinha de _trigo_, açúcar, gordura e óleos vegetais (palma, girassol), gordura vegetal totalmente hidrogenizada (palmiste, palma), cacau magro em pó (5,4%), soro de _leite_ em pó, amido, emulsionante: lecitina de girassol, mono e diglicerídeos de ácidos gordos, polirricinoleato de poliglicerol, triestearato de sorbitano; soro de _leite_ em pó parcialmente desmineralizado, sal, aroma (contém _leite_), levedantes: bicarbonato de sódio, cremor tártaro; antioxidantes: extrato rico em tocoferóis, palmitato de ascorbilo, ácido ascórbico; acidificante: ácido cítrico, conservante: ácido sórbico, corante: beta caroteno.
KitKat 50
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Belgas Cobertura or KitKat 50?
Overall, Belgas Cobertura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
KitKat 50 has fewer calories: 438 kcal versus 456 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Belgas Cobertura has less sugar: 35 g versus 35.1 g per 100 g.