Beemster vs Bastiaansen jong belegen
Overall, Bastiaansen jong belegen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beemster | Bastiaansen jong belegen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 381 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 32.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 23 g | 21.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 24.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bastiaansen jong belegen has 17% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Bastiaansen jong belegen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Beemster
LAIT de vache pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant microbien, colorant [E160b)]. 3 mois d'affinage min. La croûte n'est pas comestible.
Bastiaansen jong belegen
Gepasteuriseerde koemelk*, zout, zuursel (melk), vegetarisch stremsel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beemster or Bastiaansen jong belegen?
Overall, Bastiaansen jong belegen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beemster has fewer calories: 381 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beemster has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.