Bavaria Blu vs Blacksticks Blue
Overall, Blacksticks Blue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bavaria Blu | Blacksticks Blue |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 442 kcal | 391 kcal |
| Fat | 43 g | 33.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 29 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13.7 g | 22.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blacksticks Blue has 12% fewer calories (391 kcal vs 442 kcal).
- Blacksticks Blue has 22% less fat (33.5 g vs 43 g).
- Blacksticks Blue has 28% less saturated fat (21 g vs 29 g).
- Bavaria Blu has 25% less salt (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Blacksticks Blue has 39% more protein (22.3 g vs 13.7 g).
- Bavaria Blu is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bavaria Blu lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Bavaria Blu
Pasteurisierte Milch, Kochsalz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff
Blacksticks Blue
FULL FAT COLOURED BLUE VEINED COW'S MILK CHEESE, COLOUR (ANNATTO NORBIXIN).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bavaria Blu or Blacksticks Blue?
Overall, Blacksticks Blue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blacksticks Blue has fewer calories: 391 kcal versus 442 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bavaria Blu has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.