Comparison
Batavia vs Batavia format maxi
Overall, Batavia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Batavia | Batavia format maxi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Batavia format maxi has 94% less fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Batavia has 33% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Batavia has 29% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Batavia
Batavia.
Batavia format maxi
Batavia
FAQ
Which is healthier: Batavia or Batavia format maxi?
Overall, Batavia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Batavia format maxi has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Batavia has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.